Who DraftView is for
Use DraftView when AI-generated documentation PRs are outpacing human review.
Primary audience: documentation owner
- Documentation leads and staff technical writers
- DevEx, DevRel, and developer documentation managers
- Engineering leads who own docs in their repositories
This person usually connects the GitHub App, owns rollout, and champions adoption.
Secondary audience: reviewers who validate quality
- Product managers
- Legal and compliance reviewers
- Subject matter experts such as support, security, or solutions teams
- External reviewers
These reviewers often do not have GitHub accounts. DraftView supports their review flow through magic-link access and verify-and-push.
Tertiary audience: compliance and governance owners
These teams need to answer one question with evidence: "Can you prove a qualified human reviewed this AI output before merge?"
DraftView fits when
- AI tools open docs PRs faster than your team can review.
- Docs PRs spread across repositories and lose visibility.
- Non-technical reviewers cannot work effectively in GitHub diffs.
- Your team must verify whether follow-up AI commits actually addressed feedback.
- You need a durable sign-off and oversight trail.
DraftView is not the right tool when
- Your docs do not live in GitHub pull requests.
- You need a docs host, CMS, or static-site generator.
- You need a code review product for source code, not documentation.